Articles

It's 'The People's Pier,' but Navy Pier Isn't Run That Way

Wednesday, August 13, 2014
by Marc J. Lane



 -
Navy Pier, Chicago's No. 1 tourist attraction, has a storied history. Over its 100-year life, it's been a commercial shipping destination, a Navy training center, a University of Illinois campus, a convention site and, most recently, a lakefront entertainment complex. But today not all of Navy Pier's stories are being told.

Three years ago, the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, or McPier, the public body that owns the pier, leased it for a dollar a year to Navy Pier Inc., a nonprofit corporation it helped set up to run the property and preserve its heritage as “the people's pier.” McPier loaned its spinoff $5 million in seed money, continues to pour millions more dollars into it and even allows it to piggyback its bonding authority.

Navy Pier Inc. — a legal fiction, some might conclude — took over the pier's operations, employs its staffers and contracts with its vendors, restaurants and others. Nevertheless, the nonprofit claims that it's not a “public body” and, for that reason, it's exempt from the state's open records law, a view that Illinois' attorney general shares.

So the nonprofit refuses to disclose its employees' names or salaries, its contracts, its leases, minutes of its board meetings, or the mechanics of its bidding and procurement process. The taxpayers who ultimately are footing much of the nonprofit's overhead are expected to trust, but not to verify, the efficiency of its operations, let alone the integrity of its management.

FOLLOW THE MONEY (IF YOU CAN)

Navy Pier Inc. is no mom-and-pop operation. Chicago's Polk family recently pledged $20 million, the largest gift in the pier's history, to help the nonprofit jump-start a multiyear modernization of the iconic landmark and its adjacent Gateway Park. A five-story boutique hotel to be financed, built and operated by private developers handpicked by Navy Pier Inc. also is on the drawing board.

As things stand, the nonprofit won't need to justify how it's spending $115 million it received when McPier took on public debt to help fund the pier's face-lift, nor will taxpayers learn who cashes in on its massive redevelopment. For now, any sweetheart deals, noncompetitive bidding or discrimination against minority or women-owned businesses remains beyond the scrutiny of watchdogs.

But the issue is in the courts, where reason should prevail. Although the Freedom of Information Act doesn't apply to every nonprofit corporation that receives and expends public funds, it should apply to Navy Pier Inc., which, whether a public body or not, clearly functions as one.

When McPier turned control of Navy Pier over to its nonprofit subsidiary, neither was absolved of its fiduciary duty to account to the public for the decisions it makes.

Peterborough's problem was daunting: Sixty percent of prisoners serving short-term sentences historically had gone on to re-offend within a year after their release. But policymakers were confident that a solution was within their reach. They attracted private investment to pay experienced social service agencies to provide intensive, multidisciplinary support to short-term prisoners, preparing them to re-enter society and succeed outside the penal system. - See more at: http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20131007/OPINION/131009850/a-new-kind-of-futures-contract-for-illinois#sthash.ThgxeiFt.dpuf

The world's first social impact bond, or SIB, was introduced in 2010 to fund innovative social programs that realistically might reduce recidivism by ex-offenders in Peterborough, England, and, with it, the public costs of housing and feeding repeat offenders. Prudently building on the strengths of that initiative, Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn is rolling out SIBs to help solve some of the state's most vexing social problems.

A SIB isn't a traditional bond where investors are guaranteed a fixed return but a contract among a government agency that agrees to pay for improved social outcomes, a private financing intermediary and private investors. SIBs shift the risk of experimenting with promising but untested intervention strategies from government to private capital markets, with public funds expended only after targeted social benefits have been achieved.

Peterborough's problem was daunting: Sixty percent of prisoners serving short-term sentences historically had gone on to re-offend within a year after their release. But policymakers were confident that a solution was within their reach. They attracted private investment to pay experienced social service agencies to provide intensive, multidisciplinary support to short-term prisoners, preparing them to re-enter society and succeed outside the penal system.

The government decided which goals would be supported, but exactly how those goals would be achieved was left to the private sector. It was the investors, through a bond-issuing organization, who ultimately endorsed the allocation of investment proceeds — how much would be invested in job training, drug rehabilitation and other interventions.

If the Peterborough plan eventually shrinks recidivism rates by 7.5 percent or more, the government will repay the investors' capital and share the taxpayers' savings with them, delivering up to a 13 percent return. If the target isn't hit, the investment will have failed and the government will owe the investors nothing.

Illinois' SIB effort was spearheaded by the state's Task Force on Social Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Enterprise — the governor's think tank on social issues, which I am privileged to chair — with support from Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Aurora-based Dunham Fund. A request for information issued by the Office of Management and Budget on May 13 yielded responses from service providers eager not only to reduce recidivism here but also to create jobs, revitalize communities, improve public health outcomes, curb youth violence, cut high school dropout rates and alleviate poverty.

Now the governor has issued a request for proposals intended to spur better outcomes for Illinois' most at-risk youth — by increasing placement stability and reducing re-arrests for youth in the state's Department of Children and Family Services, and by improving educational achievement and living-wage employment opportunities justice-involved youth most likely to re-offend upon returning to their communities.

Kudos to Mr. Quinn for bringing SIBs to Illinois. May they soon start delivering on their promise.

- See more at: http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20131007/OPINION/131009850/a-new-kind-of-futures-contract-for-illinois#sthash.ThgxeiFt.dpuf
The world's first social impact bond, or SIB, was introduced in 2010 to fund innovative social programs that realistically might reduce recidivism by ex-offenders in Peterborough, England, and, with it, the public costs of housing and feeding repeat offenders. Prudently building on the strengths of that initiative, Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn is rolling out SIBs to help solve some of the state's most vexing social problems. - See more at: http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20131007/OPINION/131009850/a-new-kind-of-futures-contract-for-illinois#sthash.ThgxeiFt.dpuf

 -

Marc J. Lane is a Chicago attorney and chairman of the Illinois Task Force on Social Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Enterprise.

Photo of Navy Pier by Bert Kaufmann via Flickr.com

Reprinted from Marc Lane's August 13, 2014 editorial which appeared in Crain's Chicago Business. Crain Communication Inc.'s permission is gratefully acknowledged. Copyright © 2014 by Crain’s Communications Inc.


The Law Offices of Marc J. Lane, A Professional Corporation
180 North La Salle Street
Chicago, Illinois 60601-2701
(312) 372-1040
Nationwide: (800) 372-1040
Facsimile (312) 346-1040
Email:
success@MarcJLane.com

Websites: www.MarcJLane.com


 

Announcing Marc J. Lane's 35th Book:

The Mission-Driven Venture: Business Solutions to the World's Most Vexing Social Problems

More About The Book
Our monthly newsletter